Showing posts with label Sense of Community Study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sense of Community Study. Show all posts

Monday, April 3, 2017

My Can of Stars = What IFs


After gathering needed readings and first read of articles on Social Presence, I now have real questions---to mean real questions that pop out (not as a means to satisfy a proposal submission nor like somekind of afterthought upon seeing that there is rich source of data to match questions) but more like it was questions that bug me at the onset of this new found curiosity on Social Presence. Of course it was a product of prior interest in sense of community, the COI and teacher presence.  

Looking back at my first month of studies at USQ, I think I picked up Social Presence from 1 email exchange with Dr PR. And then since I thought maybe it was connected with Sense of Community ( the first construct I studied upon entering the online teaching-learning world, and hands on experience with a virtual community site building), I decided to explore a better understanding of it. So I just read and read and read, alongside practising my a new tool, EndNote. 

Then the few interviews and field visits I managed to do alongside only confirm recent research done on Open High Schools. I therefore see that I cannot compromise a few plans I've had at the back of my mind for this research endeavor.

I came around to asking my adviser a question, then of course, she managed to see through what I was trying to word into an actual research question.  

It practically opened what I can only label as a A CAN of STARS-- you can literally see me having stars surrounding my head, not out of a bad bump, but more out of sheer excitement with this new study I am treading on...and neatly seeing how it is a continuation of prior curiosities.

So Id like to capture this moment, knowing that at some point, the stars may become dark clouds of confusion or a mud of messiness...let that take care of itself. For now,  try to see what Im seeing.....


Given that in a specific context such as learning communities in transition,  there are clear cut/ defined roles among  teachers and learners. But then possibly, there may exist shared roles in the area of SP and sense of community.

What if through my study, I initially capture the educational experiences of learners through the elements of the COI:  “what is the nature of the educational experiences of learners in the Open High School?”

Then afterwards,  I attempt to capitalize on SP and TP  in the process of building  a virtual community site in support of existing attempts to go blended or online.
This can be done by introducing/ co-facilitating the use of a virtual learning community site (either as learner support/ tutor/ and HS teacher) to jumpstart online community building, socialization, and with spaces for class related discussion forums, will this still be fine?... and if so, will this mean an action research component?

Then how about, I reexamine and investigate the elements of COI, particularly the development and interaction of the TP and SP overlap, that is, "setting the climate for learning": “Upon the development of a virtual community site for OHS teachers and learners, what will be the manifestations of TP and SP in setting the climate for learning? What will the interactions of TP and SP be like? How do these contribute to specific outcomes—such as sense of community or self efficacy or even initial CP?


Maybe then, a reinterpretation of the COI framework/ model will emerge, if not maybe additional indicators of it, or perhaps a rearrangement of the elements will take place, to fit the context of learning communities in transition…like a prequel version of a COI which may be applied at the secondary, and in support of movement towards the direction of a more genuine COI at the higher education level. Therefore, my study asks:
In what ways can the COI framework be utilized to examine the educational experiences of teachers and learners of the  Open High School  in the Philippines?
-->

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Auto-ethno

One feedback Mam Jean of my EDDE 206 is this: that I could have made an autoethnographic research out the Comm site paper. How could she have known what I was trying to do which I didn't know I was doing? In other words, I knew that I can do that paper on my own but I wasn't sure I was doing the right thing. For one, it bothered me ab it to have to write something about a VC which I didn't start out nor authored in the first place so I wanted to give credit to that. So I felt that the right thing to do was to get the site author as my co writer. Then in the midst of writing the paper, I was torn between writing about my experiences (or should I say using my own voice to speak up) and instead went for the voices of other members of the community site. I also wanted to find out how the site author viewed my usage of the site hence I went for his perspective of looking at the VC when what I could have done is to go with my instincts to critically analyze my lived experiences as an active site member with an online identity and shared connection equally evolving alongside others' members and it just so happened that I was the one in the position to look at our experiences in that way.

Hence the purposes of autoethnography. I think it does not deny the presence of the self as it is too important to deny in the first place. The researcher cannot be faulted at that. In the case of an autoethnographic researcher, it acknowledges the researcher as community member=CMR=community/complete member researcher (Anderson, 2006)

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Pepper Acceptance

Abstract

hide details 7:36 PM (14 hours ago)


Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you very much for sending the abstract of your paper for the SIC - ODL 2011. I am glad to inform you that the Abstract Evaluation Committee has accepted your abstract. Kindly therefore go ahead with the preparation of your full paper and submit it within the prescribed deadline i.e. December 31, 2010.
The Committee desires that you should take note of the following two points in your full paper:
1. Relevance of substance of the paper to the theme and the sub-theme
2. Contribution to the theory and practice of Open & Distance Learning

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
Dr. S.K Gandhe
Chair, Program Organization Committee,
Symbiosis Centre for Distance Learning,
Pune, India. Te. +91-20-66211171
Mobile +91-9370315621
E – mail : skgandhe@scdl.net

Friday, February 5, 2010

Abstract; Track Changes

Abstract No. 181

Paper Title
Nurturing a Sense of Community at the UP Open University Community Site  

Abstract
Research into distance education often shows a positive relationship between a sense of community and learning among adults. To some adult learners, there is more to online learning than the fulfillment of academic work. From a socio-cultural perspective, learning in a virtual community is also about the expression of online selves, identity construction and building a sense of community.

Building a sense of community is a constant challenge at the UP Open University (UPOU), the first tertiary level institution in the Philippines to offer distance education programs to adult learners from both graduate and undergraduate levels. Its current student population engage in online academic courses through UPOU's Moodle-based learning management system. Whilst there are small packets of extra-curricular discussion sometimes encouraged by individual faculties-in-charge, UPOU has yet to explore other platforms to harness involvement and participation among its community members, most especially the students. This is where the UPOU Community Site comes in. The UPOU Community Site is one distinct virtual community developed and maintained by a faculty member outside the course domain. This site was created to cater to students, alumni, faculty and staff who feel there is more to being part of UPOU than just the studies, work and research.

But what does the UPOU Community Site truly mean to these adult learners who manage to sustain online and offline engagements through this virtual community? This case study purposely narrated the development of the UPOU Community Site from the perspective of its current users who care enough to maximise it as a tool and platform for programme improvements, community building activities and interaction. Through narrative inquiry, this study was able to surface varied meanings that a select group of adult learners attach to this virtual community. The study examined how faculty members and students express their online selves, construct their identities and engage in community building activities outside their usual academic coursework. The study aimed at making explicit the nature of this virtual community's growing sense of community in order to arrive at possible directions it can pursue for it to thrive.

The study provided evidence as to how a virtual community can become a valuable platform to extend the online world of adult learners in order to contribute to an open university’s evolving community of practice. This qualitative research grounded itself on an interpretive-critical paradigm, so the study was able to draw out possible goals and strategies from adult learners-site members in order to sustain engagements among its current users as they continue to take part in building and nurturing a sense of community with the larger population of UPOU adult learners it hopes to reach.

Abstract Acceptance...woohooo...lagot!

Dear Villanueva Aleta

We are pleased to inform you that your abstract has been accepted by the ICT2010 Conference Review Panel.

Please be informed that the latest date to submit the full / brief / best practice presentation paper is Monday, 15 March 2010. However, as an author, you can enjoy a special registration rate of S$375 for the conference if you submit your full, brief or best practice paper by 1 March 2010.

Please take note of the comments from our review panel:
1. See email attachment with track changes (file: 181_tracking changes.doc).

A full research paper should be between 8 and 10 pages and up to 5,000 words. A brief paper should be between 4 and 6 pages and up to 2,500 words. Please select the type of paper (full or brief paper) you wish to submit. However, the ICT2010 Conference Academic Committee reserves the right to advise you to change the type of paper after it has been reviewed by our review panel.

I attach the author's guideline for the full / brief paper and the best practice presentation to this e-mail.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Best regards
Academic Chair
ICT2010 Singapore Conference
--

Friday, January 8, 2010

New Questions: Layer 2 ...testing

Set B:

This is like you sort of observing and analyzing the users (active and new)--from the standpoint of a faculty and member of the UPOU community in general.

Do you see that students have gotten more connected through the site?
In what ways?

What exchanges do you think were meaningful to students? Why so?

To what extent is the site achieving its goals?


Set A:
-What are your initial perceptions of UPOU students based on your observation of their online behavior?


-Have your perceptions changed? What else have you discovered about their online behavior as students/members of the virtual community?


-What have you learned from these online/ offline experiences with site members, in terms of making students feel that they're part of a larger community?

Sample Questions: First Layer...testing

What pushed you to create the community site for UPOU? Did it like just dawn upon you like the way you make your music?



-Tell me about how you put the contents/things together at the site...what factors did you consider with your choice of webhost, the design/theme contents/folders, the gallery. Or did these things come to you naturally having had previous experience with managing or moderating forums?


-Is there a difference with the work and interaction YOU do (and experience) via the UPOU community site versus previous sites/forums you've been with?


-Did you expect it to be discovered (by anyone from UPOU)? What were your initial plans for it to be noticed...or launched?

-Have your expectations been met in terms of initial response, site usage, current users?
Or maybe, any frustrations or unmet expectations?


-Any surprises...in terms of interaction/ experience you did not foresee nor expect (but happened) from users (old and new), you included?



-Would you consider this site as one to put in your list of creative work or accomplishment? Why so or...why not if ever?

Questions for Site Users

These questions were given to active users to elicit their narratives:

* What is the UPOU community site to you?
* How did you learn about it?
* What's with this virtual community which sustained your interaction with
fellow community members?
* What have you learned from these experiences in terms of making fellow students
feel that they're part of a larger community?


These questions I crafted from the ff, Primo's initial questions for Chancy's mag-type publication:


* What is the UPOU community.net?
* How has the UPOU community platform helped you and the students in program coordination?
* What have you learned from these experiences in terms of making students feel that they're part of a larger community?


Of course, I'd have to craft a different set of questions to the site moderator-co writer. That would be difficult.

I mean how do we communicate our narratives and at the same time reflect on these as researchers--there must be a way to do this though--do we distance ourselves when we are both the story bearers and readers and seers?

What's Brewing....

Cutting and pasting an email exchange:

Re Site stats: What good will it do?
(I'm thinking aloud + figuring out something here to get to a certain point)
That article from where I got those site stats actually say that such stats didn't provide enough basis to evaluate site interaction in the VC. And so the article went on to use other means to describe the nature of interaction among members of the VC qualitatively.

I'm thinking along these lines...
to include some kind of data in your narrative in terms of:
-threads which garnered most number of hits/ responses
-threads which YOU as moderator see as indicatives of quality interaction
-threads which provide evidence that there is a growing sense of community

Okie. Now I have Part 2 questions brewing ...

In the end, I guess, to examine the interaction and sense of community at the site, we need to use the ff:
-narratives from a set of guide questions
-contents from specific threads at the site
-questionnaire/ checklist (there's a sense of classroom community survey I got somewhere which I can tweak to use at the site for active users and new users)

Is there any other data you think we should include?

But there's a WOW here cuz finally I stepped out of that OC-ness of looking at review of lit.I am now getting into concerns re data gathering and analysis...yehey.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Tasking, Of Course!

Wk 1
Villanueva
-start work on review of lit notes

-organize references

-bug Dave, Iyen and Blaise for their narratives

-create working paper format:

-start working outline of review of lit

-write paper parts: aim of the study, theoretical frame, methodology, research
questions


Librero
-answer interview questions as part of narrative inquiry data gathering

-provide data re: site stats

-start reading stuff re VC's, sense of community and community of practice to get an idea re: theoretical frame


Wk 2-3
Villanueva
-chat-discuss with Al
-Write review of lit
-work on TM A's related to paper—expound on methods of data gathering and analysis

Librero
Scheduled chat with aleta- start discussing re significance of the study: “Why is this paper worth
writing? What does it attempt to contribute in the body of research?”

-write 1 paragraph re significance of the study

-refine review of lit

Wk 4
Villanueva
-Conduct FGD's
-redo the sense of community questionnaire
-distribute to site users

Librero
-start work on paper intro
-review existing data gathered—narratives to look at recurring themes
and what these mean

WK 5
pause to consult with Primo

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Abstract Submission Jan 1 version

Research in distance education show a positive relationship between sense of community and learning among adults. To some adult learners, there is more to online learning than the fulfillment of academic work. From a socio-cultural perspective, learning in a virtual community is also about the expression of online selves, identity construction and building a sense of community.

Building a sense of community is a constant challenge at the UP Open University (UPOU), the first tertiary level institution in the Philippines to offer distance education programs to adult learners in the graduate and undergraduate levels. Its current student population engage in online academic courses through UPOU's Moodle-based learning management system. While there are small packets of extra-curricular discussion sometimes encouraged by individual faculties-in-charge, UPOU has yet to explore other platforms to harness involvement and participation among its community members, most especially the students. This is where the UPOU Community Site comes in. The UPOU Community Site is one distinct virtual community developed and maintained by a faculty member outside the course domain. This site was created to cater to students, alumni, faculty and staff who feel there is more to being part of UPOU than just the studies, work and research.

But what does the UPOU Community Site truly mean to these adult learners who manage to sustain online and offline engagements through this virtual community? This case study purposely narrated the development of the UPOU Community Site from the perspective of its current users who care enough to maximize it as a tool and platform for program improvements, community building activities and interaction. Through narrative inquiry, this study was able to surface varied meanings a select group of adult learners attach to this virtual community. The study examined how faculty members and students express their online selves, construct their identities and engage in community building activities outside their usual academic coursework. The study aimed at making explicit the nature of this virtual community's growing sense of community in order to arrive at possible directions it can pursue for it to thrive.

The study significantly provided evidence as to how a virtual community can become a valuable platform to extend the online world of adult learners in order to contribute to an open university’s evolving community of practice. As this qualitative research grounded itself on an interpretive-critical paradigm, the study was able to draw out possible goals and strategies from adult learners-site members in order to sustain engagements among its current users as they continue to take part in building and nurturing a sense of community with the larger population of UPOU adult learners it hopes to reach.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Framing New Questions Here

So, I need to do this once again lest I get lost in the rubble of existing theories.

My questions:
1) What does the UPOU community site mean to its current users/ adult learners?
2) Do adult learners get a sense of community through the site?
3) In what way can this virtual community evolve into or contribute to a community of practice within UPOU?


Layers of Review of Research:
-virtual community: what does current research say about how adult learners use and make meaning out of a virtual community outside an online learning community?
-adult learners and sense of community: what does current research say about how valuable a sense of community is among adult learners? is it automatic in an online learning community?
-communities of practice: how does it evolve? what can be explicitly done for a virtual community to evolve into a community of practice?


Gray areas which I need to clarify:
-will this be ethnography or phenomenology?
-will narrative inquiry work as data gathering method?

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Draft 3

Here is abstract draft 3 which I just emailed to my co-writer, Librero.
I am still awaiting for any response though I got an initial heads up...that YES he is willing to write this paper with me.

I tweaked the first version of the abstract based on Primo's suggestions.

Here goes:

Brief Intro to UPOU

The University of the Philippines Open University is the first tertiary level institution which caters to ______________________________________. It is commited to_________________________________. Its current population are mainly working students and adult learners who are geographically dispersed and come from diverse backgrounds.

It maintains an online learning community of adult learners in the graduate and undergraduate levels.


Brief Intro: The UPOU Community Site

Alongside engagement in these online academic courses, students also engage in virtual communities outside their virtual course sites. One distinct virtual community is the UPOU Community Site, developed and maintained by a faculty member of the university.

This site aims to_____________________________________________________________________________.

It was created solely for____________________________________________________________.

Though considered as an unofficial site, this virtual community is currently used by a mixed group of students and faculty members who care enough to maximize it as a tool and platform for program improvements, community building activities and virtual interaction.

What the paper intends to do:

This paper narrates the development of a virtual community site from 3 perspectives: a faculty-member-site moderator, 3 student-adult learners, a faculty member-program chair. This select group of community members have managed to sustain online engagements with fellow students through this site. This paper examines how members find meaning and relevance to their identities as members of the UP Open University through this virtual community. The paper describes how site users engage in this virtual community to meet certain ends: academic, and interactive. It also looks into how the virtual community supports other online and offline experiences adult learners are initiating to build a sense of community alongside academic responsibilities as members of the UPOU community.


The Paper's potential contribution

The paper significantly surfaces nuances, potential and possibilities for this virtual community to contribute to an evolving community of practice in the UP Open University. Maintaining a virtual community outside online course sites is valuable to these adult learners as they search for their identity and sense of belonging within the university. Through the UPOU Community Site, ongoing virtual exchanges go beyond the usual academic work and student affairs. Faculty members and students are able to express their online selves and eventually nurture genuine connections with each other. The paper suggests possible goals and roles active members can take in order to sustain engagements among users and continue to build connections with the larger population of UPOU adult learners it hopes to reach.



As follows is crude outline of prospective portions of the paper.


Intro:
-the place of virtual community in an online learning environment of adult learners
-the UPOU community (stats)

Background:
-a narration of the development UPOU Community site

Statement of Aims

-to describe how adult learners of UPOU make use of UPOU Community Site
-to examine meanings attached by adult learners to this virtual community vis a vis a growing sense of community
-to investigate the whether in fact there is a growing sense of community among current site users
-to draw out important recommendations in order for members to sustain engagement in this site and build connections with the larger population the virtual community hopes to reach

Research Questions:
-How do adult learners make use of the UPOU Community Site?
-What does this virtual community mean to active users of the site?
-Does this site truly contribute to adult learners' sense of community?
-In what ways can it work towards building a community of practice in UPOU?

Methodology
-quali
-phenomenology
-interpretive-critical

Theoretical Frame:
-community of practice
-sense of community
-online self
-virtual community

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Scattered Pepper Thoughts

Good that Ma'am Jean decided to support my change of topic and change of plan.
She also put emphasis on quali research as searching for 'meanings'.

Putting here my initial ideas:
Aims of the Study:
--to narrate the development of UPOU Community site
-to describe the nature of online usage among adult-member-learners
-to draw out valuable roles and future goals of the site in building a true sense of community among its current and prospective members it hopes to reach

Research Questions:

Research Questions:1) How does the UPOU Community Site continue to evolve as a tool/ platform among adult learners of the UP Open University?2) How do current adult members make use of this site as a tool/ platform to meet their ends?3) What future potential and possibilites can this virtual community take in order to encourage engagements from the wider population of adult learners of the UP Open University?

Draft Abstract:
The UP Open University is a university with geographically dispersed students from diverse backgrounds. It maintains a virtual learning community which caters to adult learners in the graduate and undergraduate levels. Alongside engagement in these online academic courses, students also engage in virtual communities. One distinct virtual community is the UPOU Community Site, developed and maintained by a faculty member of the university. Though considered as an unofficial site, this virtual community is currently used by a small but mixed group of students and faculty members who care enough to maximize it as a tool/ platform for program improvements, community building activities and online socialization. This paper narrates the development of a virtual community site from 3 perspectives: a faculty-member-site moderator, 3 student-adult learners, a faculty member-program chair. Through this site, members have managed to sustain engagements which spill over online and off line experiences alongside their academic responsibilities as members of the UPOU community. This paper examines how members engage in this virtual community to meet certain ends: academic, and interactive. The paper significantly surfaces nuances, potential and possibilities among its end users. It recommends possible roles members can take in order to facilitate and sustain engagements in the light of building a true sense of community amongst the larger population of UPOU adult learners it hopes to reach.